Edgemont Incorporation signs

The Edgemont Incorporation Committee (EIC) announced April 15 it will draft a new petition in hopes of making the hamlet Greenburgh’s seventh village. It will be the group’s third petition in its four-year battle to self-govern.

Following a major blow to EIC’s incorporation effort last February when the New York State Appellate Court denied the EIC petition for incorporation, the EIC decided not to appeal the court’s decision to the New York State Court of Appeals and will instead move forward with a new petition.

For proponents who seek to hold a referendum on incorporation, it’s been an uphill battle. When the Appellate Court agreed with Greenburgh Town Supervisor Paul Feiner’s argument that the petition failed to include a description of the territory to be incorporated with common certainty, it ruled that although the petition indicated that the proposed village boundaries were coterminous with the Greenville Fire District, records showed otherwise.

While the court denied the EIC’s petition due to common certainty, it ruled against Feiner’s mainstay arguments for denying the petition. The justices ruled that New York State village law didn’t require the list of regular inhabitants (LORI) to be completed and attached at the time of signing the petition and that the LORI was accurate even though it didn’t directly include the names and addresses of minors who live in the area to be incorporated.

A source familiar with the case told the Inquirer that getting past the major objections raised by Feiner in his petition denial about the LORI and its preparation was going to be advantageous when forming its third incorporation petition.

As was the case when the EIC appealed its first petition, there is an expectation that court costs will need to be paid out, though it isn’t clear yet how much those costs will be.

According to Jim Hallowell, an Edgemont resident and partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher who represents the incorporation petitioners, court costs related to the appeal from the first petition are still unresolved. The town requested the EIC pay $32,405 to cover the town’s printing costs.

Feiner, who has long expressed his opposition to incorporation, told the Inquirer it was important that the town remain unified, and that if Edgemont were to incorporate it would be “devastating” and result in “major financial ramifications.” He said he believes the state should pass a law to allow all the residents in the unincorporated area of a town to vote if an area wishes to incorporate.

“I think the state comptroller’s office should basically do an analysis of the financial implications and share it with both people in Edgemont and the rest of the town,” said Feiner. “When you’re dealing with incorporation, you’re dealing with major long-term impacts and I think people shouldn’t vote on the basis of campaign literature [or] rhetoric from one side or the other. There should be an independent, totally objective analyst.”

In 2018, when the EIC experienced a similar petition denial by the Appellate Court and appealed the ruling, the Court of Appeals refused to hear the case.

In an email to their supporters, EIC members said they expected Feiner to raise new challenges with the third petition, but that they were confident his efforts wouldn’t prevent a vote.

Jeff Sherwin, president of the EIC, said he expects volunteers from the organization to begin collecting petition signatures by the summer.

“No rational person would want their right to vote impaired or delayed,” Sherwin said. “We obviously wish we could have already voiced our opinion … [and] had our vote, but that’s not going to stop us from getting one.”

(2) comments

Critical Thinker

*wisest course is for the Petitioners

Critical Thinker

In a case upstate where the Supervisor had rejected three petitions, the Appellate Court said enough is enough and called out the naked voter suppression. Perhaps the wisest course is of the Petitioners to tell the 11 homeowners who are creating the alleged uncertainty as to the boundary of the proposed village due to a fire district overlap, they have to forego their ability to be part of the Village of Edgemont.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.